Border Environment Research Reports
(Number 2 - June 1996)
Reducing Emissions from Brick Kilns
in Ciudad Juárez: Three Approaches
This summary was prepared by Dana V.
Hamson and is based on the technical reports listed at the end of this paper.
Dr. Octavio Chávez provided helpful suggestions and recent data.
Summary
A major source of pollution in the El
Paso-Ciudad Juárez area is the emissions from several hundred independently-owned
brick kilns on the Mexican side of the border. Three projects sponsored by the
Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy currently are working on
ways to reduce these emissions and other SCERP projects have addressed these issues
in the past. An essential requirement for abatement solutions developed by SCERP
researchers is that these must be within reach of the modest financial resources
of the kiln owners. The core objectives of the SCERP projects are co-firing waste
fuel with less polluting gas fuels, using solar dryers to reduce baking times,
and training brickmakers in using less polluting methods of firing bricks and
like products.
Background
According to a 1992 environmental report
published by EPA and its Mexican counterpart agency, the El Paso-Ciudad Juárez
area has some of the worst air quality in all of North America. The major sources
of this area's pollution, in descending order of contribution, are vehicles, unpaved
roads, open burning, and desert climatic conditions. Much of the pollution generated
from open burning comes from the numerous brick kilns currently operating in Ciudad
Juárez. There are several estimates on the total number of kilns, but recent
research indicates that there are about 260 kilns in the city, but not all are
in operable condition. On an average, about 8 kilns are fired on any one day.
The kilns, which in some cases burn toxic waste fuels such as tires or used motor
oil, are a major source of particulate pollution (PM10), as well as of carbon
monoxide (CO). Depending on fuels used, they produce other pollutants like benzene
and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
The Southwest Center for Environmental
Research and Policy (SCERP) is currently supporting three studies on the problems
of the brick kilns. SCERP researchers at the Ciudad Juárez campus of
the Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM, or Monterrey Tech)
have been working with private and governmental organizations on both sides
of the border to bring the first of the three projects to fruition. This project
on co-firing waste fuels with less polluting fuels actually began in 1991 when
a Mexican nonprofit organization, the Mexican Federation of Private Health and
Community Development (FEMAP), and Empresas de Solidaridad established a training
center for brickmakers called the Instituto de Investigaciones Ecotecnológicas
(IIET). El Paso Natural Gas Company provided funds for the center's operation
and the Los Alamos National Laboratories have provided technical assistance.
The goal of this training center is to teach brickmakers, through a series of
four courses, methods of brick firing that both improve environmental conditions
and do not strain the limited resources of kiln owners.
In another study, researchers from
the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) are cooperating with FEMAP to investigate
the possibility of reducing pollution by shortening the firing time of the bricks.
Current methods require that up to a third of total firing time be used in order
to remove moisture from the bricks. Researchers are therefore exploring the
use of low temperature solar collectors as a drying device.
The University of Utah is conducting
yet another experiment to substitute less polluting natural gas or propane fuels
for a portion of the waste fuels. While complete substitution of these cleaner
fuels for the tires and scrap wood customarily used by the kiln owners would
be ideal for air quality improvement, this solution is not economically feasible
given the owners' financial resources and the higher cost of propane and natural
gas. The objective of this project is to find the least costly combination of
fuels that will produce the least amount of pollution.
The Brick Industry
Background. The brick industry
is vital to the economies of Mexican border cities and regions elsewhere in the
country as it provides the primary construction material for the walls of most
Mexican buildings. The industry's impact on employment is significant as well.
In all of the northern border cities, there are around 1,100 brick kilns in operation.
In Ciudad Juárez alone, there are approximately 260 brick kilns, with about
800 individuals employed in the direct production of bricks. Approximately 1,500
additional jobs in the city are related to the brick kilns, in transportation
and other activities. Another 2,500 individuals are dependent family members of
brickmakers in Ciudad Juárez. Attempts to reduce pollution must take into
consideration the lives and well-being of these workers and their dependents.
Brickmakers. The brickmakers
are generally very poor and minimally educated, with an average of only three
and one-half years of schooling. The mean age of the brickmakers is 46. The
homes of the brickmakers are extremely modest, with an average of 1.1 rooms
per home, and a mean of almost five persons per home. Brickmakers are paid very
little, and their "homes" are often made of cardboard or scrap wood, shoddily
erected on land next to the kilns. Less than half of these homes (43%) have
sewer facilities. Thirty-nine percent of all brickmakers' families have had
at least one child die.
Process. The brickmakers
work an average of seven months per year due to weather conditions that limit
production. The process of making bricks begins when workers mix clay, water,
and sand, often using their feet near the end of the mixing to ensure the correct
consistency. The finished mix should be smooth and evenly moist, and it is left
covered with plastic overnight. The mix is then thrown by hand into open brick
molds that hold three to five bricks.
The bricks must then be dried before
they are fired. To dry them, the brickmakers place the molded bricks on the
ground and periodically rotate them. An experienced brickmaker can tell when
a brick is ready for firing by the sound it makes when it is hit against another
brick.
At the beginning of the firing process,
the kiln is left uncovered so that all of the moisture remaining in the bricks
can evaporate. When the workers no longer see water vapor above the kiln, the
kiln can then be covered. After 16 to 24 hours of firing, the bricks are ready.
The most common fuel used for firing is waste fuel that can be obtained at virtually
no cost to the owners, including tires, battery cases, plastics, wood, sawdust,
particle board, and used motor oil. Some owners also use more expensive fuels
such as fuel oil, diesel, natural gas, or propane.
Costs. Kilns average 10,000
bricks per bake, and the mean number of bakes per month is .98. About five percent
of each batch of fired bricks is unusable. The primary cost to kiln owners is
labor. Even the kilns themselves cost little to build, since they are made of
adobe brick. Kiln owners who operate within the city must pay a bit more, however,
since they must also cover the cost of transporting materials to the kiln site.
Fuel costs range from 15% to 30% of total production costs, depending on the
type of fuel used. A good production cost is about US$635, and a good profit
per bake is about US$127.
Not only does this process of brickmaking
generate a great deal of harmful pollution, it also fails to produce a quality
brick. Brickmakers claim to be able to produce bricks of higher quality. However,
because builders most often choose the cheapest bricks regardless of quality,
there is little incentive for brickmakers to improve quality. The bricks on
the market in Mexico, therefore, have poor strength, high water absorption characteristics,
and inadequate insulation properties.
The Brickmakers' Training Center
The first project, which FEMAP began
in Ciudad Juárez in 1991 and ITESM and SCERP became involved with in 1993
and 1994, has two primary aims: a social objective and an environmental objective.
The social objective is to increase the welfare and quality of life of the brickmakers
and their families. At the same time, FEMAP and the other organizations hope to
accomplish the environmental objective of decreasing air pollution in Ciudad Juárez
(and in the binational airshed that is shared with El Paso) by promoting the use
of cleaner burning fuels in brick firing. The three strategies employed by the
researchers to accomplish these aims are:
- to conduct research on improving
the brickmaking process within the resource limits of the kiln owners;
- to train brickmakers in improved
processes and better technologies; and
- to alter market forces that encourage
polluting brickmaking practices.
FEMAP, with the support of the Mexican
federal agency Empresas de Solidaridad and El Paso Natural Gas, constructed the
Brickmakers' Training Center (Instituto de Investigaciones Ecotecnoló-gicas-IIET)
in Ciudad Juárez to facilitate the accomplishment of the social and environmental
objectives. The Training Center houses a research facility that has three experimental
kilns designed by engineers from El Paso Natural Gas Company and Los Alamos National
Laboratories. A fourth kiln, designed by researchers at IIET, has produced promising
results with 25% fuel savings as compared with the kiln designed by El Paso Natural
Gas. Researchers conduct experiments relating to every aspect of the brickmaking
process, including drying, kiln design, and fuels used. The information derived
from these experiments is passed along to the brickmakers through a series of
four classes.
Courses. The Training Center
offers four technical courses:
- Brick Production Process and Alternative
Products,
- Fuel, Combustion, and Pollution,
- Heat Transfer, and
- Industrial Safety.
The first course, Brick Production Process
and Alternative Products, covers current practices of brickmaking, along with
explanations of the physical and chemical changes that occur during the process.
Costs of producing the bricks are also presented, as well as ways to improve the
quality of the finished product. The Fuel, Combustion, and Pollution course outlines
the costs of the different kinds of fuels used in the firing. The combustion process
is also explained, and the resulting pollution and health consequences from using
different fuels are presented. The third course, Heat Transfer, contains information
about thermal efficiency and how different methods of heat generation affect the
process of brickmaking. Brickmakers are also taught how to prevent heat loss and
resulting failures. Finally, the Industrial Safety course shows brickmakers how
to safely handle gas fuels and to recognize danger signs in firing.
These classes are designed to be
easily understood even with low levels of education, since most of the brickmakers
have not completed elementary school. To further simplify the transfer of new
technology from researchers to brickmakers, instructors have developed four
comic book style texts to accompany each course (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Text for Course on Fuel, Combustion and Contamination
As of June 1996, a number of the
courses have been offered with a total of some 325 brickmaker participants,
most of them kiln owners. Eighty of the participants were from Ciudad Juárez,
which represents only about 5% of the total number of brickmakers in the city.
However, because most participants were kiln owners, their employees represented
close to 50% of all brickmakers in the city. The remainder of the participants
were from Zacatecas, Torreón, Saltillo, San Luis Potosí, San Luis
Río Colorado, Agua Prieta, Chihuahua, and from even as far away as Mexico
City. Dormitories are available at the Training Center for out-of-town participants.
Results. The training courses
have seen very positive results in the form of changes made by many brick kiln
owners in the Ciudad Juárez area. The number of kilns using tires, plastics,
and other high polluting fuels has been greatly reduced, with the majority of
them turning to sawdust and wood chips. Up to 60% of all brick kilns in Ciudad
Juárez have used liquid propane, although the number of kiln owners purchasing
gas fuels at any one time depends on the market price of these fuels. The course
on how to use liquid propane and natural gas has been beneficial, since those
who were using gas fuels prior to the class were able to reduce fuel consumption
by nearly 30%. This was mainly due to tips provided during the courses on how
to conserve heat during bakes. Other positive results have been that brickmakers
have nearly doubled the number of bakes per month by making changes in labor
practices, and suggestions on improving the brick mixtures by using better quality
materials have resulted in an improved quality brick. Many of these courses
cover ideas that the brick kiln owners may have already known, but by emphasizing
these better procedures and giving the owners a chance to practice them helps
the new techniques to become common practice.
Researchers from ITESM have also
been working with the local and federal governments to improve building regulations.
In proposed legislation drafted by the university, new building construction
would require bricks fired with liquid propane or natural gas. This would assure
that environmentally cleaner fuels would be used and the benefits to the region
would be significant.
Research on Drying Bricks
The University of Texas at El Paso is
conducting research primarily on the brick drying process. Before the bricks can
be fired to the temperature requisite for structural use, all of the moisture
must be eliminated. Currently, brickmakers dry the bricks in the open air on the
ground, which eliminates all but 5% to 10% of moisture in the bricks. The bricks
are then fired uncovered in the kiln until they have no moisture content (which
is evident when water vapor is no longer visible over the kiln). This process
of removing all moisture from the bricks uses from one-fifth to one-third of the
total fuel necessary for firing. Researchers at UTEP are experimenting with solar
dryers to eliminate more moisture from the bricks prior to firing, thus reducing
firing times, total fuel needed per bake, and cost to brick producers.
Field tests of small-scale solar
dryers have been performed to see if significantly more moisture is removed
from the bricks this way than by open air drying (Figure 2). The moisture content
of a brick right out of the mold is about 27%. After baking in the sun-about
three days in the summer, six in the winter-5% to 10% of the total brick content
is still water. The water is stored in the brick in two ways-as chemical (bonded)
water and as mechanical (unbonded) water. Mechanical water can be removed via
solar dryers, but chemical water cannot be removed except when temperatures
of at least 400degC are reached. In other words, even when solar dryers are
used, bricks will require at least some firing to remove the chemical water.

Figure 2. Solar Dryer Side View
UTEP performed several tests over
time on three different methods of drying:
- placing bricks in convection ovens,
set at 65.6degC and 104degC,
- drying in solar dryers, and
- sealing bricks in plastic bags
in the sun.
Bricks were placed in solar dryers for
five to seven days, where temperatures reached between 70degC and 80degC. The
solar dryers were found to remove 1% to 2% more moisture than natural drying.
Convection ovens were found most effective of all, with the dryer set at 65.6degC
removing 3% more moisture than natural drying (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Weight Change of Bricks with Different Drying Methods
In another test, solar dryers were
again compared with convection ovens and natural drying where the bricks were
not sealed in plastic bags. The solar dryer and convection oven performed similarly,
bringing the bricks to a 5% moisture content sooner than those dried in the
sun reached this content. The total amount of moisture removed was also greater
in the solar dryers than with natural dryers.
This study is scheduled to be completed
in the summer of 1996, when more complete information on these tests will be
available.
University of Utah: Co-Firing Waste
and Gas Fuels
Firing bricks exclusively with gaseous
fuels drastically reduces the amount of soot and other particulates, as well as
toxic gases like carbon monoxide and nitrogen monoxide. However, because the brick
kiln owners could not absorb the substantial increase in cost that would result
in switching to firing exclusively with gaseous fuels, more feasible solutions
for reducing emissions must be explored. Previous research at the University of
Utah has shown that firing even small amounts of gas fuels (about 10%) in conjunction
with liquid and solid fuels, can reduce carbon monoxide emissions by up to 80%.
In addition, adding gas fuels to the mix can improve thermal efficiency that,
in turn, reduces the total amount of fuel needed to fire the bricks.
The focus of the University of Utah
research is to decrease emissions of pollutants and to decrease consumption
of gas by:
- co-firing gas with other fuels,
and
- changing kiln operation and/or
design in order to improve heat efficiency.
Modifications of brick kilns are being
evaluated with the limited resources of the owners in mind, and only those solutions
that are economically and technically feasible will be implemented.
A pilot-scale brick kiln has recently
been designed and completed at the University of Utah, and testing began in
February 1996. The kiln is full-scale in height and one quarter-scale in width
and depth. The facility will burn locally available waste fuels that include
sawdust, wood scraps, and agricultural wastes. Gas will be fired above the kiln
bed to reduce emissions. Researchers will monitor kiln exhaust for concentrations
of polluting emissions. Results of the study will be included in the brickmakers'
training courses in Ciudad Juárez so that the outcomes can be effectively
transferred to brick producers.
Conclusion
SCERP researchers are attacking the
problem of polluting emissions from the Ciudad Juárez brick kilns in three
innovative ways. The training courses have been very successful to date, helping
many brick kiln owners and their employees produce bricks more efficiently while
reducing toxic emissions. Solar dryers and co-firing fuels are also promising
solutions, and as those projects are completed, the results will be integrated
into the training courses. Brick kiln owners have been receptive to many of the
suggestions made by researchers, which has resulted in better quality bricks,
improved thermal efficiency of the kilns, and less pollution from the kilns.
Sources
The following reports were used to prepare
this SCERP Border Environmental Research Report. Please note that many of them
are available on the SCERP World Wide Web home-page
Chávez, O. (1995). "Brick
Makers' Project." Paper presented at the SCERP Technical Conference, San Diego,
California, March 1995.
Lowery, N. A., and Chávez,
O. E. (1995). "Study of Brick Kiln Designs and Development of Technical Courses
for the Brickmakers Training Center in Cd. Juárez." Final
Report, Project Number MIEP. Southwest Center for Environmental Research
and Policy. SCERP World Wide Web homepage.
Lowery, N. A., and Wicker, R.. (1995).
"Study of Brick Kiln Designs and Development of Technical Courses for the Brick
Makers Training Center in Cd. Juárez." Report
#AQ94-5.3. Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy. SCERP
World Wide Web homepage.
Lowery, N. A., and Wicker, R. (1995).
"Study of Brick Kiln Design and Development of Technical Courses for the Brick
Makers' Training Center in Ciudad Juárez." Abstract, Project
Number AQ95-2. Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy. SCERP
World Wide Web homepage.
Silcox, G. D., Lighty, J. S., and
Pershing, D. W. (1995). "Minimizing Emissions from Brick Kilns by Modification
of Combustion." Final Report, Project
Number AQ94-5.2. Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy.
SCERP World Wide Web homepage.
Torrence, A. (1995). SCERP
and Brickmaking in Cd. Juárez. World Wide Web homepage, Southwest
Center for Environmental Research and Policy.
Additional copies of this report
may be obtained from the Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias,
San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4403; tel. (619) 594-5423; Fax
(619) 594-5474; e-mail irsc@mail.sdsu.edu
Copyright © 1996 by Institute for
Regional Studies of the Californias Published by Institute for Regional Studies
of the Californias, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4403
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
ISBN 0-925613-21-5
Return to SCERP's
home page Contact the SCERP
webmaster Site map
Last updated 5/6/99